Improving Product Quality by Increasing Your GD&T Fluency

The geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) standard can cause reading and interpretation errors due to its complex nature. When an individual’s ability to comprehend and utilize this fundamental industry standard is limited, potential costly oversights and inaccuracies can occur, ultimately affecting a company’s bottom line.

part call out in engineering drawing
Render explaining form deviation permitted per Rule #1

A significant area of manufacturing that can be impacted by a lack of GD&T language fluency and comprehension is product quality. Ways in which a limited understanding can affect this quality issue include the following:

Design vs. manufacture: When a designer has an incomplete knowledge of GD&T, they may not include GD&T on a print where necessary. As a result, the manufacturing team now must struggle to produce the part without the guidance that GD&T would have provided. If the manufacturing team also has a limited understanding of the GD&T on a print, the part may not be manufactured correctly, making it difficult to assemble. In any of these situations, an increase in scrapped parts may occur.

Inspection errors: A poor grasp of GD&T can also dramatically affect the inspection process. When inspectors do not have a clear comprehension of GD&T and the relationships conveyed between the features on a part, good-quality parts may be scrapped and bad-quality parts may pass inspection. The ramification of both situations could have a significant impact on an organization’s costs.

All areas of design, manufacturing, and inspection need to know GD&T so that it can be applied consistently throughout an organization. In situations where these respective teams are not equally in alignment, quality is compromised, further affecting the bottom line profitability. Uniform and accurate interpretation of GD&T results in a highly profitable process that has less rework and faster cycle times. Individuals and organizations who have a full comprehension of GD&T have the greatest potential for success.

This final installment concludes our GD&T series where we discussed the impact of GD&T understanding on the manufacturing process. Ready to become fluent in GD&T? Check out our GD&T Fundamentals course, and contact sales to set up a trial.


Kavita Krishnamurthy is an ASQ certified Six Sigma Black Belt with over 15 years of experience in the field of process improvement, manufacturing engineering, and quality management in the automotive and gear industries. She is also the subject matter expert of our GD&T Fundamentals course.

Beyond Symbols: Fluency in GD&T Decreases Cost

Due to the complex nature of the geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) standard, a company’s bottom line profitability can be affected as a result of reading and interpreting errors. Users who have a lack of knowledge concerning the rules, symbols, conventions, and associated terminology of GD&T are more likely to make incorrect decisions.

 

Render of a projected tolerance zone

One such area where a deficit in GD&T language fluency and comprehension can impact manufacturing is in the prototyping process. Situations where a limited understanding can affect this crucial process include the following:

Ineffective design: Designers who do not fully understand the concepts of GD&T may not include GD&T on a print where it would be beneficial. As a result, the part is now much more difficult to manufacture as required information, such as position tolerances, was not provided to ensure the part met fit, form, and function.

Inaccurate manufacturing: Even when GD&T is effectively provided on a print, it may not be understood by the manufacturing team. As a result, there is a higher chance that the part will not be manufactured to the print’s requirements, thus impeding the assembly process. Inaccurate manufacturing means wasted materials, time, and money.

Increased timeline: A limited understanding of GD&T in design, manufacture, or both can lead to multiple back and forth cycles in the prototyping process. With every additional cycle, the time it takes to bring the part into production increases, causing the prototyping timeline to grow longer. Longer timelines equal higher costs, which will ultimately affect bottom line profitability.

The inability to understand and interpret GD&T at any stage of development can have a huge effect on a company’s track to production. Therefore, it is essential for individuals within an organization’s design and manufacturing teams to all be well versed in the language of GD&T in order to have the greatest potential for success.

In the next installment of our GD&T series, we will discuss how an incomplete understanding of GD&T can impact product quality. We at THORS are also happy to announce that our GD&T Fundamentals course has launched!


Kavita Krishnamurthy is an ASQ certified Six Sigma Black Belt with over 15 years of experience in the field of process improvement, manufacturing engineering, and quality management in the automotive and gear industries. She is also the subject matter expert of our GD&T Fundamentals course.